16._ Dialogue

It is clear that to see with the "return vision" it is necessary to believe first in God. We think that it is a perfectly legitimate attitude --the one that we maintain--, and not merely as a reasonable hypothesis or useful postulation, although requires of special foundations of which we will speak later.

The attitude or vision "of going", that only takes into account the inner reality to the process, and that doubts the purpose of this one, also seems to us certainly legitimate. Even more, we thought that it is advisable and necessary in some scopes --like scientist--, although it is not more than to preserve us of certain contamination "deist" who could alienate us of our own capacities and responsibilities, when attributing everything to a "Deus ex-machina" not truly immanent.

But also we thought that both visions can be maintained without contradiction, perhaps alternating, without wanting to mix them or synthesizing them, each one in its independent scope, but dialoguing as far as possible to become rich mutually.

(If a somewhat colorful resemblance is allowed us, both visions are like the lights of an automobile: the short one is the one "of going", the long one is the one "of return".)

previous-blog----------------------------------------------index----------------------------------------------------------next-blog